Close Menu

NEW YORK (360Dx) - A federal court in Washington, DC has modified a ruling about whether labs can be held legally responsible for determining the medical necessity of lab tests ordered by physicians.

Last June, US District Court Judge Reggie Walton raised alarm in the lab industry when the wording of his denial of a motion to dismiss a False Claims Act lawsuit suggested that labs have "an obligation" to determine the medical necessity of tests. The lawsuit, Groat v. Boston Heart Diagnostics, was brought by former UnitedHeathcare Medical Director Tina Groat.

To read the full story....

...and receive Daily News bulletins.

Already have a 360Dx or GenomeWeb account?
Login Now.

Don't have a 360Dx or GenomeWeb account?
Register for Free.

Feb
23
Sponsored by
Thermo Fisher Scientific

As the world continues to contend with coronavirus and a surge in the infection rate, labs are required to run more samples than ever before. 

Feb
24
Sponsored by
SCHOTT MINIFAB

Developing a fully integrated consumable cartridge for an automated diagnostic platform is a significant challenge. More challenging still is developing such a cartridge in response to a deadly global virus pandemic amid market uncertainty and extraordinary time constraints.